Sunday, September 23, 2007


Needed a new look, sorry.

Came across this post while wading through the various blogs/articles regarding the debate taking place on our campus. It helped me, especially since it's from someone who was at the meeting.

This is from Dr. Carrigan, a prof in our Earth Science department. His PHD is from the University of Michigan. He is responding to a blog on a sight at Calvin College.

". . . Secondly - I would like to take this opportunity to shed some light on the events that have been occurring here at ONU regarding the removal of Rick Colling from teaching the general biology course here this year. Rick and the university have gotten some pressure from anti-evolutionists since the publication of "Random Designer" a few years ago. In the book, Rick basically tries to argue that evolution is compatible with Christianity. Although the majority of our constituents have no problem with our science here, there is a vocal minority that leans strongly toward Young-Earth Creationism. I believe that 2 members of the University's Board of Trustees are against evolution being taught at ONU, but most are not. The Nazarene Church has a tradition of a "big tent" approach to science from the theology standpoint, and so not many in leadership positions are so strongly opposed to evolution that they would ask for a professor teaching it to be removed. Dr. Bowling has written about this and made that case very strongly that Rick is not outside the bounds of Nazarene doctrine & tradition. When one YEC advocate asked Pres. Bowling if there were any YEC scientists here at ONU to 'provide balance', he stated that ONU doesn't have anyone like that, and that he doesn't think there is anyone like that in the entire Nazarene educational system. However, the pressure against Rick has been building. This past summer, President Bowling met with the natural science faculty and explained what he was asking from the Biology Department and why. It was clear to me that he was attempting to help the situation die down by removing Rick from the "bull's eye". In my opinion, he was doing his best that he thought necessary for the university and for Rick. I strongly support Pres. Bowling's decision here. The hope was and is that, after some time, the turmoil that is out there will subside; in Pres. Bowling's words, he was attempting to "make peace". However, I am not sure that Rick saw it this way, and the article in Newsweek has come since that meeting. I was very disappointed that the Newsweek article chose to state that Pres. Bowling "banned" the book from ONU courses. While I suppose that is technically true, the word carries with it too much baggage. Pres. Bowling stated that it was certainly possible that things could change in the future if the situation were to become less volatile. I was disappointed that the article was phrased in ways that made the good name of Pres. Bowling and ONU look bad, because it discredits the good science that is being taught here by many of our professors. In my opinion Pres. Bowling has been one of the greatest advocates for the science faculty here. He gave a message in Chapel in Jan. of 2006 where he discussed science & faith; I can send a copy of this to those who are interested.

Here are a few important facts that were not mentioned in the Newsweek article:
1) the science of an old Earth/Universe has been taught at ONU for at least 40 years that I know of - I'm sure it goes farther back than this but I'm not aware of who the faculty were before that time. ONU has been around for 100 years, but has not in all of those years offered college level science courses.
2) Other faculty members here at ONU have taught these same scientific concepts for many decades, and there has never been this kind of reaction to any of them.
3) Pres. Bowling made it very clear to us in the early Summer meeting that he was not in any way attempting to alter the content of the Gen. Biology course that he removed Colling from - Colling's removal from the course is not a content issue.
4) None of the other books out there that talk about science and Christianity have similarly been "banned", such as those by Falk, Collins, Young, Polkinghorn, Murphy, Ramm, Miller, etc.etc.

Best Regards,
Charles

Charles W. Carrigan, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Geology
Olivet Nazarene Univ., Dept. of Physical Sciences"

3 comments:

Chris said...

wow...that's an interesting little reaction going on up there.

I hate to see that kind of division happen over something that really can't be resolved.

Fred said...

There is no conflict between faith and science, faith being the acceptance of revealed truth and science being the evidential quest for explaination of fact.

Why is it that Christians act as if the faith is somehow threatened by science? This, I do not understand. Indeed, Christians are unique on this planet in that we are the only prople who should not fear the truth.

Now it is true that there are many who believe science to be superior to and contradictory to the Christian faith. These live by a faith that is of themselves whos foundational assumption masks the inner contradiction. They are often marked by a vehement defense of chosen conclusions and a resistance to open debate in fear of exposure.

Anonymous said...

Hey Mark, I have been trying to follow this story for the past week or so and appreciate the information you provided.

As you can imagine, knowing my bent toward raging as you do, I have been quite "unsettled" by the whole thing.

Keep posting!